Apr 18, 2023

AES Signs On to Letter to Cigna Regarding Its Modifier 25 Policy

Dear Mr. Cordani:

On behalf of the undersigned organizations representing physicians and health care professionals across the country, we request that Cigna immediately rescind its policy requiring submission of office notes with all claims including evaluation and management (E/M) Current Procedural Terminology (CPT®) codes 99212, 99213, 99214, and 99215 and modifier 25 when a minor procedure is billed. Cigna recently notified network providers that payment will be denied for E/M services reported with modifier 25 if records documenting a significant and separately identifiable service are not submitted with the claim. We share Cigna’s belief that appropriate use of modifier 25 should be paid in full for both the E/M service and procedure, while inappropriate use of modifier 25 should be prevented. We urge Cigna to reconsider this policy due to its negative impact on practice administrative costs and burdens across medical specialties and geographic regions, as well as its potential negative effect on patients, and instead partner with our organizations on a collaborative educational initiative to ensure correct use of modifier 25.

Strong clinical basis for correct use of modifier 25
While the stated intent of this policy is to reduce inappropriate use of modifier 25, Cigna has not offered data demonstrating unexpectedly high use of the modifier or details of the underlying rationale, other than indicating it resulted from a review of “coverage, reimbursement, and administrative policies for potential updates” and in consideration of “evidence-based medicine, professional society recommendations, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) guidance, industry standards, and/[or] . . . other existing policies.” We question what standards or guidelines Cigna consulted in initiating this policy change, as the CPT description clearly states that modifier 25 enables reporting of a significant, separately identifiable E/M service by the same physician or other health care professional on the same day of a procedure or other service. The clinical vignettes included in a March 2023 CPT Assistant article1 illustrate the strong clinical basis for use of modifier 25 to support effective and efficient care. Indeed, by facilitating the provision of unscheduled, medically necessary care, modifier 25 supports prompt diagnosis and streamlined treatment—which in turn promotes high-value, high-quality, and patient-centric care. In contrast, Cigna’s policy creates a disincentive for physicians and other health care professionals to provide unscheduled services, which may force patients to schedule multiple visits (with additional co-payments) to receive necessary treatment.

We also object to language in Cigna’s policy suggesting that appropriate use of modifier 25 requires that the E&M service address a “new” problem. (“The separate E/M service must be significant enough to require a separate service, i.e., address a new or distinct problem.”) This conflicts with CMS guidelines quoted in the Cigna policy stating that, “The E/M service and minor surgical procedure do not require different diagnoses.” We request that Cigna remove this inaccurate statement from the policy, as it contradicts both CMS and CPT guidelines indicating that an E/M service reported with modifier 25 does not need a different diagnosis than what was reported for the concurrent procedure.

Administrative Burden and Waste
Our organizations are alarmed by the significant administrative burdens and costs for health care professionals— and Cigna—that will result from implementation of this policy. By bluntly requiring clinical documentation for all claims for an E/M service reported with modifier 25, physicians and other providers will be forced to submit an enormous number of office notes, and Cigna will be deluged with medical records. Indeed, Cigna previously advised medical societies that only a small percentage (i.e., 10 percent) of submitted documentation would be reviewed under this program. This troubling admission demonstrates Cigna’s awareness of the unmanageable volume of records in question and, more importantly, highlights the pointless administrative waste created by the policy.

Cigna’s proposed data submission methods exacerbate these issues. The first option—a dedicated fax number—relies on paper-based, time-consuming technology that will involve major manual burdens for health care professionals and their staff. The alternative is an email address created for this program, use of which could jeopardize patients’ privacy and health care professionals’ compliance with Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) requirements if the documentation is sent via unsecure email. Of note, Cigna’s policy notification to network providers makes no mention of the need to secure protected health information, placing both parties (health care professionals and Cigna) at risk of HIPAA noncompliance. Implementing and maintaining a secure email system to comply with this documentation requirement would be costly and burdensome for physician practices and other providers. For email to be considered a valid option for sending records, Cigna should cover the implementation and maintenance costs associated with secure messaging to protect patients’ privacy and ensure compliance with federal and state law.

The suboptimal data submission methods proposed by Cigna reflect the current lack of an electronic standard for clinical record exchange. Although CMS recently issued a proposed rule addressing electronic attachment transaction standards for claims,2 timing for finalization of this rule is highly uncertain. In the meantime, the industry faces costly, manual data exchange methods that are divorced from the electronic claim—leading to inevitable reassociation problems, lost information, time-consuming data resubmission, and delayed claim payments. All of these concerns underscore that Cigna’s policy is extremely ill-timed and will further hamper health care professionals already grappling with clinician burnout, workforce shortages, recovery from the COVID-19 public health emergency, and rising practice expenses due to inflation.

Opportunities for collaboration and education
Without clear justification for this policy or data suggesting inappropriate use of modifier 25 by network providers, we cannot specifically respond to Cigna’s concerns leading to this program change. However, our organizations support correct use of modifier 25 and stand ready to collaborate with Cigna on a more rational (and far less burdensome) approach to ensure appropriate coding.

We welcome the opportunity to partner with Cigna on a modifier 25 initiative that would entail:

  1. Targeted outreach: While we appreciate Cigna’s stated goal of paying in full for correct use of modifier 25 and support efforts to advance correct coding and documentation, we vigorously object to health plans penalizing all health care professionals—regardless of whether or not they code correctly—with blunt modifier 25 policies. Instead, we urge Cigna to selectively engage network providers with unexpected coding patterns in follow-up education and dialog.
  2. Education on correct coding: Many of our organizations offer educational resources to our members on correct use of modifier 25, including a recently published CPT Assistant article.3 We would be happy to work with Cigna on dissemination of these materials and/or collaborate on training activities.
  3. Limited documentation: If Cigna persists with documentation requirements for E&M services reported with modifier 25, only network providers with consistent patterns of miscoding should be targeted.


Conclusion
We welcome the chance to collaborate with Cigna on alternative approaches to ensuring correct usage of modifier 25 that do not unfairly punish the majority of physicians and other health care professionals that appropriately code, as well as tax Cigna’s administrative systems. If you would like to discuss this issue further, please contact Robert D. Otten, Vice President, Health Policy, American Medical Association, at 312-464-4735 or rob.otten@ama-assn.org.



1 American Medical Association. Reporting CPT Modifier 25. CPT®Assistant (Online). 2023;33(11):1-12. Available at: https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/reporting-CPT-modifier-25.pdf.

2 Administrative Simplification: Adoption of Standards for Health Care Attachments Transactions and Electronic Signatures, and Modification to Referral Certification and Authorization Transaction Standard. Available at: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/12/21/2022-27437/administrative-simplification-adoptionofstandards-for-health-care-attachments-transactions-and.

3 American Medical Association. Reporting CPT Modifier 25. CPT®Assistant (Online). 2023;33(11):1-12. Available at: https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/reporting-CPT-modifier-25.pdf.

To: 

David Cordani
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
The Cigna Group
900 Cottage Grove Road
Bloomfield, CT 06002

From:

American Medical Association

American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology

American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

American Academy of Dermatology Association

American Academy of Family Physicians

American Academy of Neurology

American Academy of Ophthalmology

American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy

American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery

American Academy of Pediatrics

American Academy of Sleep Medicine

American Association of Clinical Urologists

American Association of Neurological Surgeons

American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine

American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

American Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons

American Chiropractic Association

American College of Cardiology

American College of Chest Physicians

American College of Emergency Physicians

American College of Lifestyle Medicine

American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics

American Medical Association

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

American College of Physicians

American College of Rheumatology

American College of Surgeons

American Epilepsy Society

American Gastroenterological Association

American Geriatrics Society

American Nurses Association

American Optometric Association

American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society

American Osteopathic Association

American Podiatric Medical Association

American Psychiatric Association

American Rhinologic Society

American Society for Clinical Pathology

American Society for Dermatologic Surgery Association

American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

American Society for Radiation Oncology

American Society of Anesthesiologists

American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

American Society of Dermatopathology

American Society of Echocardiography

American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians

American Society of Neuroradiology

American Society of Nuclear Cardiology

American Society of Plastic Surgeons

American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

American Society of Retina Specialists

American Thoracic Society

American Urological Association

American Venous Forum

Association for Clinical Oncology

Congress of Neurological Surgeons

Medical Group Management Association

North American Neuromodulation Society

North American Spine Society

Outpatient Endovascular and Interventional Society

Renal Physicians Association

Society for Vascular Surgery

Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons

Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography

Society of Interventional Radiology

Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Spine Intervention Society

Medical Association of the State of Alabama

Arizona Medical Association

Arkansas Medical Society

California Medical Association

Colorado Medical Society

Connecticut State Medical Society

Medical Society of Delaware

Medical Society of the District of Columbia

Florida Medical Association

Medical Association of Georgia

Hawaii Medical Association

Idaho Medical Association

Illinois State Medical Society

Indiana State Medical Association

Kentucky Medical Association

Louisiana State Medical Society

Maine Medical Association

MedChi, The Maryland State Medical Society

Massachusetts Medical Society

Michigan State Medical Society

Minnesota Medical Association

Mississippi State Medical Association

Missouri State Medical Association

Nebraska Medical Association

Medical Society of New Jersey

Medical Society of the State of New York

North Carolina Medical Society

North Dakota Medical Association

Ohio State Medical Association

Oregon Medical Association

Pennsylvania Medical Society

Rhode Island Medical Society

South Carolina Medical Association

Tennessee Medical Association

Texas Medical Association

Utah Medical Association

Vermont Medical Society

Medical Society of Virginia

Washington State Medical Association

Wisconsin Medical Society

Wyoming Medical Society