Abstracts

Contributions to Quality of Life in Individuals with Developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathies

Abstract number : 2.481
Submission category : 11. Behavior/Neuropsychology/Language / 11B. Pediatrics
Year : 2025
Submission ID : 1393
Source : www.aesnet.org
Presentation date : 12/7/2025 12:00:00 AM
Published date :

Authors :
Presenting Author: Natasha Ludwig, PhD – Kennedy Krieger Institute

Melissa Licari, PhD – The Kids Research Institute
Mary Wojnaroski, PhD – Nationwide Children’s Hospital/Ohio State University
Gabrielle Conecker, MPH – Decoding Developmental Epilepsies
JayEtta Hecker, MS – Decoding Developmental Epilepsies
Rebecca Hommer, EdD – University of Maryland
Kelly Muzyczka, PhD – Decoding Developmental Epilepsies
Peter Jacoby, PhD – The Kids Research Institute
Jenny Downs, PhD – The Kids Research Institute Australia; Curtin School of Allied Health

Rationale:

Understanding the factors that contribute to quality of life (QoL) is essential for designing meaningful, patient-centred interventions for individuals with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs). To identify key predictors of QoL without imposing prior assumptions, we employed a hypothesis-free regression tree analysis, allowing for data-driven exploration of variables most strongly associated with QoL outcomes across multiple domains.



Methods:

A questionnaire was completed by 242 caregivers of individuals with DEEs (74%) and other severe neurodevelopmental encephalopathies 2 years of age. QoL was measured using the Quality of Life Inventory-Disability (QI-D). Independent variables described health, functional abilities and daily activities. The R package rpart was used to build the regression trees to explore the most influential factors associated with QoL.



Results:

Median age was 8.8y (interquartile range 4.6-14.9y); however, developmental age as measured by the Developmental Profile, Fourth Edition (DP-4) fell below a 12-month level across domains. Mean total QI-D score was 60.2+14.1 out of a total possible score of 100. The subgroup with the lowest QoL scores comprised individuals with low (raw score < 4; age-equivalent of 4-5 months) cognition scores measured with the DP-4 (n=52, mean score 46.4) whereas higher QoL scores were achieved by individuals with higher cognition scores and capacity to engage actively when using a touchscreen (n=123, mean score 67.5; Figure 1). Notably, small differences in DP-4 Cognition scores representing foundational cognitive capacities like alertness and responsiveness to the environment were associated with steep increases in QoL (Figure 2).

Behavior