Abstracts

Lamotrigine Treatment for New Onset Absence Epilepsy: Comparison of Responders and Non-Responders

Abstract number : 1.125;
Submission category : 4. Clinical Epilepsy
Year : 2007
Submission ID : 7251
Source : www.aesnet.org
Presentation date : 11/30/2007 12:00:00 AM
Published date : Nov 29, 2007, 06:00 AM

Authors :
M. Frank1, G. L. Holmes2, A. Vuong3, S. Kerls3, A. Hammer3, J. A. Messenheimer3

Rationale: While previous studies have documented the efficacy of lamotrigine as monotherapy in typical childhood absence seizures, the studies did not examine whether pre-treatment characteristics of the children were predictive of response rate. The objective of this analysis was to compare characteristics of responders and non-responders to lamotrigine in children with newly diagnosed typical absence epilepsy.Methods: Children ranging in age between 3-13 years meeting enrollment criteria (n=54) as demonstrated by generalized spike-wave discharges (2.5-4.5 Hz) lasting > 3 seconds on a 1-hour electroencephalogram (EEG), underwent a 24-hour ambulatory EEG and then entered an Escalation Phase (≤20-weeks) during which the lamotrigine dose was titrated until seizures were controlled or maximum dose was reached. For this study, a patient was considered a responder if they had no absence seizures for two consecutive weeks as confirmed by hyperventilation for clinical signs and 1-hour EEG. Patients responding to treatment then underwent a repeat 24-hour EEG.Results: Of the 54 patients evaluated, 30 (56%) were responders (seizure-free) while 24 (44%) did not achieve seizure freedom. There were no differences in mean age (responders 7.2±2.6 years; non-responders 7.5±2.9 years), baseline weekly seizure count (responders 6.0±2.1 seizures; non-responders 6.1±2.3 seizures), baseline seizure number on the pre-treatment 24-hour EEG (responders 57.8±49.3 seizures; non-responders 63.7±51.4 seizures), and baseline total seizure duration on the pre-treatment 24-hour EEG (responders 532.5±436 seconds; non-responders 662.8±467.8 seconds). There were no significant differences in responder rate between the young children (3-7 years, n=24; 50% response rate) and older children (8-13 years, n=25; 62% response rate).Conclusions: Lamotrigine was effective in suppressing absence seizures in newly diagnosed patients. Age of seizure onset, frequency and duration of absence seizures as measured on the pre-treatment 24-hour EEG was similar in the responders and non-responders. In this large cohort of drug naïve patients with typical childhood absence seizures, the response rate to lamotrigine was not influenced by age of onset, seizure frequency or seizure duration.
Clinical Epilepsy